MDCT Aortic Root & Patient Anatomy
Real-Time Inverse CompilerInverse Compiler Optimal Prosthesis & Live Biomechanical Twin
OPTIMAL: NAVITOR_VISION_273-Radical Abjad Hemodynamic Manifold Transition (Pre → Post TAVR)
CRITICAL_CALCIFIC_STENOSIS → LAMINAR_COMPLIANT_EUHEMODYNAMIC
[غ-غ-غ] ← [ذ-ط-ح]
Selected Prosthesis
NAVITOR 27mm
Self-Expanding • Score 89.4
Mean Gradient (Pre→Post)
50.6 → 4.1
mmHg (Net Catheterization)
Post-Op EOA / iEOA
2.54 / 1.38
cm² | PPM: NONE
Coronary VTC (LCA/RCA)
5.57 / 6.62
mm (Safe Clearance ≥ 4mm)
PVL Regurgitant Frac
2.28%
Grade: NONE / TRACE
AORTIC ROOT, CORONARY VTC & DEPLOYED STENT FRAME
LEFT VENTRICULAR PRESSURE-VOLUME (P-V) LOOP (PRE vs POST TAVR)
Commercial Bioprosthesis Candidate Matrix (SAPIEN 3 Ultra RESILIA • Evolut FX+ • Navitor Vision)
Sorted by VARC-3 Biophysical Composite Optimality Score| Rank | Prosthesis ID | Platform Family | Oversizing % | Implant Depth | Post Mean PG | Post EOA / iEOA | PPM Risk | PVL Grade (RF%) | VTC LCA / RCA | Pacemaker Risk | VARC-3 Score |
|---|
Doppler & Catheterization Inputs
Spectral Navier-Stokes + CassonSpectral Navier-Stokes Resolution & Pressure Recovery Deconvolution
STAGE_D1_D3_TRUE_SEVERE_AS3-RADICAL ABJAD HEMODYNAMIC COORDINATE (r1: Inertial • r2: Casson WSS • r3: Windkessel Z_va)
PARADOXICAL_LOW_FLOW_HIGH_AFTERLOAD_STENOSIS
ش-ص-ظ
Continuity EOA / ELI
0.56 / 0.61
cm² | Energy Loss Index cm²/m²
1D Bernoulli vs Net Cath PG
34.8 vs 31.2
mmHg (Pressure Recovery: 4.1 mmHg)
Valvulo-Arterial Impedance
6.40
mmHg/mL/m² (SVi: 28.0 mL/m²)
Reynolds / Womersley α
8,920 / 21.4
Peak WSS: 38.4 Pa | OSI: 0.19
ONE XI PULSE Severity Score
78.4 / 100
Bayesian P(Severe) = 0.957
Epicardial & Microvascular Anatomy
Poiseuille + Borda-Carnot SolverDeterministic Hyperemic FFR, Wave-Free iFR & Virtual PCI Stent Pullback
PCI_OR_CABG_INDICATED (FFR ≤ 0.80)Hyperemic FFR (Pd/Pa)
0.712
Ischemic Threshold ≤ 0.80
Resting Wave-Free iFR
0.841
Threshold ≤ 0.89
Virtual PCI Post-Stent FFR
0.884
Predicted Gain: +0.172 FFR
Trans-Stenotic ΔP
27.1 mmHg
CFR: 2.18 | Pd: 66.9 mmHg
PRESSURE-WIRE PULLBACK CURVE (0–100 mm FROM CORONARY OSTIUM: BASELINE RED vs VIRTUAL PCI EMERALD)
180-Case Synthetic Hemodynamic & Structural Heart Benchmark Verification
Cohort Source: Synthetic 180-case cohort (100 valvular AS + 80 coronary FFR) calibrated to published PARTNER-3 / Evolut Low-Risk / FAME-2 distributionsPan-Cardiovascular AUROC (n=180)
0.9838
vs 0.7636 Standard 1D Baseline (+0.2202)
Structural Heart TAVR AUROC (n=100)
0.9898
vs 0.7806 1D Simplified Bernoulli
Catheterization Gradient MAE
0.981 mmHg
vs 8.144 mmHg 1D Simplified Bernoulli
Coronary Invasive FFR AUROC (n=80)
0.9744
vs 0.7192 1D QCA Diameter Stenosis (MAE 0.0121)
| Cohort Subgroup | Sample Size | Clinical Challenge Addressed | 1D Baseline Performance | ONE XI PULSE™ v6.0.0 Digital Twin | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Classical High-Gradient Severe AS | n = 25 | High-velocity calcific stenosis & TAVR prosthesis sizing | Concordant | 100% Sensitivity (MAE 0.91 mmHg) | VERIFIED |
| Paradoxical Low-Flow Low-Gradient AS | n = 15 | SVi < 35 mL/m², LVEF ≥ 50%, 1D Mean PG 28–37 mmHg (Masked Severe AS) | Missed by 1D PG ≥ 40 cutoff | Rescued via ELI + Z_va + HU850 Ca | VERIFIED |
| Small Aorta Pressure-Recovery AS | n = 15 | Ascending Aorta < 27 mm where 1D Doppler overestimates invasive Cath PG | False Positive Severe AS | Abbas-Garcia Momentum Corrected | VERIFIED |
| Intermediate Serial & Bifurcation FFR | n = 22 | 54–65% DS tandem lesions causing true functional ischemia (FFR ≤ 0.80) | Missed by 1D QCA ≥ 70% DS | Coupled Poiseuille + Carina Expansion | VERIFIED |
| Focal Small-Bed Discordant Coronary Stenosis | n = 20 | 63–70% focal short lesion in small territory with non-ischemic FFR > 0.80 | False Positive Stenting | Territory-Mass & Length Corrected | VERIFIED |